- Home
- Skills
- Zephyrwang6
- Myskill
- Task Drill
task-drill_skill
- Python
79
GitHub Stars
2
Bundled Files
2 months ago
Catalog Refreshed
4 months ago
First Indexed
Readme & install
Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.
Installation
Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.
npx veilstrat add skill zephyrwang6/myskill --skill task-drill- .DS_Store6.0 KB
- SKILL.md4.8 KB
Overview
This skill guides users through decomposing tasks and deciding which parts humans should handle and which parts AI should handle. It supports four task types: Direct Problem Solving, Direct Output Generation, Collaborative Problem Solving, and Collaborative Output Generation. The skill produces step-by-step breakdowns, role assignment, and ready-to-use prompt templates. Use it whenever you need a structured plan to execute or delegate work between humans and AI.
How this skill works
When given a task, the skill first classifies it into one of the four types based on scope, information completeness, and interaction needs. It then assigns each subtask to either AI or a human, explains the rationale, and produces a clear sequence of steps. For every step it supplies the executor, explicit actions, human-to-AI prompt suggestions, and any human deliverables required. Prompts follow optimized templates for each task type to make handoffs actionable.
When to use it
- You need to decide which parts of a project an AI should perform and which require human judgment.
- You want a reproducible, stepwise plan for solving a problem or producing long-form output.
- A task seems complex or ambiguous and would benefit from multi-turn collaboration with AI.
- You need concrete prompt templates to hand AI clear instructions for each subtask.
- You’re preparing a workflow where responsibilities and dependencies must be explicit.
Best practices
- Classify the task first; that determines interaction style and granularity of steps.
- Prefer AI for data processing, pattern recognition, and first drafts; reserve humans for creativity, ethics, and final validation.
- Start collaborative work with a high-level framework, then iterate in defined rounds.
- Provide concise, context-rich inputs when calling AI to reduce clarification loops.
- Document dependencies between steps so later stages can rely on earlier outputs.
Example use cases
- Optimize a block of code: classify as Direct Problem Solving and provide a single-shot diagnosis plus suggested fixes.
- Write a technical report from data: use Direct Output Generation with a detailed brief and format requirements.
- Design system architecture: treat as Collaborative Problem Solving with iterative exploration and decision checkpoints.
- Create a product manual: use Collaborative Output Generation to establish structure, then refine sections across rounds.
- Plan a marketing campaign: decompose into research (AI), creative concepts (human+AI), and validation (human).
FAQ
If the task has a clear answer and enough input, choose Direct. If it needs back-and-forth, exploration, or progressive refinement, choose Collaborative.
Can steps switch executors mid-task?
Yes. A step can be AI-led for a draft and then handed to a human for review and finalization; document that handoff explicitly.
What makes a good prompt for each type?
Direct prompts should be specific and outcome-focused; collaborative prompts should include known constraints, open questions, and a request for next steps.