learning-design-review_skill

This skill reviews educational content against the Four Learning Design Pillars, providing structured feedback with actionable recommendations and principle
  • Python

1

GitHub Stars

1

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill vishalsachdev/claude-skills --skill learning-design-review

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

Overview

This skill reviews educational content against the Four Learning Design Pillars framework to produce a structured, actionable learning design report. It evaluates course materials, lessons, tutorials, and e-learning modules and returns strengths, gaps, scores, and prioritized recommendations tied to specific principle IDs.

How this skill works

Provide the content as a file path, URL, pasted text, or a descriptive outline. The skill compares the material against 46 evidence-based principles organized into four pillars, cites relevant principle IDs (e.g., 1.3.1, 2.2.3), calculates pillar and overall scores, and generates a clear review with prioritized fixes and quick wins.

When to use it

  • Before launch: validate a course or module for evidence-based design
  • During iteration: identify concrete changes to improve learning outcomes
  • For auditing: compare multiple courses on consistent criteria
  • When accessibility or UX concerns arise for learners
  • To turn feedback into prioritized design tasks

Best practices

  • Share full lesson text or a representative module for accurate analysis
  • Specify audience, platform, and learning objectives for contextualized recommendations
  • Use principle IDs in follow-up requests to narrow refinements (e.g., 2.3.2)
  • Prioritize fixes that increase practice + feedback and clarify objectives
  • Apply quick wins first (small effort, high impact) before larger redesigns

Example use cases

  • Evaluate a 6-lesson beginner course for alignment with learning objectives (1.3.x)
  • Audit video-heavy training to ensure microlearning and multimedia best practices (2.2.3, 2.1.2)
  • Improve a tutorial by adding low-stakes practice and richer feedback (3.1.6, 3.2.1)
  • Check an LMS module for navigation, mobile responsiveness, and media controls (4.1.1, 4.2.3, 4.3.1)
  • Create a prioritized roadmap of design changes with estimated impact and effort

FAQ

File path, publicly accessible URL, pasted text, or a structured description of the course and elements.

Will the review include exact principle references?

Yes. Each strength and gap cites specific principle IDs (for example 1.3.1 or 3.2.4) to make recommendations actionable.

How are scores calculated?

Each of the four pillars is scored 1–5, then an equal-weighted overall score is computed and accompanied by a rating and rationale.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational