research_skill

This skill helps you perform comprehensive research by combining internal knowledge, external sources, and technology evaluations to generate actionable
  • Python

5

GitHub Stars

1

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill truongnat/agentic-sdlc --skill research

  • SKILL.md2.4 KB

Overview

This skill defines a Research Agent role that performs knowledge discovery, technology evaluation, and evidence-based recommendations for the development lifecycle. It activates on explicit triggers and produces concise, cited deliverables to guide technical decisions. The agent integrates internal knowledge, automated research tools, and external sources to reduce uncertainty and speed decision making.

How this skill works

The agent first inspects the internal knowledge base and Neo4j brain to find related implementations, reusable components, and historical decisions. It then runs aggregated external searches, reviews API and library documentation, and uses specialized connectors or automated research pipelines for deeper analysis. Findings are compared objectively, trade-offs and risks are assessed, and final recommendations include implementation steps, evidence, and mitigation strategies.

When to use it

  • When you need a technology comparison or trade-off analysis
  • To investigate prior internal implementations or reusable components
  • When evaluating libraries, frameworks, or licenses for a project
  • Before making architecture or tooling decisions requiring evidence
  • To prepare feasibility summaries or proof-of-concept recommendations

Best practices

  • Always run internal KB and Neo4j searches before external research
  • Cite sources and check publication dates to ensure recency
  • Structure comparisons with clear pros, cons, and risk assessments
  • Include maintenance, community support, and license compatibility in evaluations
  • Provide an implementation path and list mitigations for identified risks

Example use cases

  • Compare two frameworks for a microservice architecture and recommend one with rationale
  • Research existing internal modules to reuse for a new feature and map dependencies
  • Produce a best-practice summary and decision matrix for CI/CD tool selection
  • Evaluate security posture and suggested mitigations for a proposed third-party library integration

FAQ

It checks publication dates of external sources, prioritizes recent documentation, and flags uncertain or outdated findings for manual review.

What deliverables can I expect from a research run?

Typical outputs include technology comparison reports, decision matrices, best-practice summaries, proof-of-concept recommendations, and an implementation path with risks and mitigations.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational