meeting-score_skill

Overview

This skill automates meeting agenda scoring by creating a Feishu multi-dimensional table, collecting independent judge ratings, and summarizing average scores per agenda item. The host supplies agenda titles, material links, and a judge list; the system builds scoring and record tables and guides permission setup. After judges submit H/M/L ratings across three customizable dimensions, the host can request a ranked summary report.

How this skill works

On initialization the skill creates two tables in Feishu: an agenda list (host view) and a scoring records table (judge view). It pre-creates one record per judge×agenda, maps H/M/L to numeric scores (H=5, M=3, L=1), and updates per-record subtotals and agenda-level averages. A scheduled poll or immediate updates compute subtotals, refresh averages, and mark completed items; the host can request a sorted summary at any time.

When to use it

• Planning scored discussions or presentations in meetings
• Collecting confidential, per-judge evaluations where judges must not see others' ratings
• Situations needing quick summary rankings of agenda items
• When you want consistent H/M/L scoring converted to numeric totals
• To automate periodic recalculation when Feishu webhooks are unavailable

Best practices

• Provide judges’ names exactly as their Feishu display names or use a member-type field to ensure row-level permission matching
• Specify three clear scoring dimensions at initialization (replace default labels)
• After table creation, follow the provided steps to enable advanced row-level permissions so each judge sees only their rows
• Start the automated polling only during active scoring and stop it when scoring is complete to save resources
• Inform judges of H=5, M=3, L=1 mapping and that repeat submissions overwrite prior scores

Example use cases

• Score project proposals during a design review and get ranked recommendations
• Evaluate short presentations in a regular team meeting with confidential judge inputs
• Prioritize agenda items after demo sessions by average impact/relevance scores
• Run a scoring round for interview presentations or candidate pitches with multiple interviewers