2.5k
GitHub Stars
9
Bundled Files
2 months ago
Catalog Refreshed
3 months ago
First Indexed
Readme & install
Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.
Installation
Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.
npx veilstrat add skill openclaw/skills --skill agent-scorecard- _meta.json289 B
- config_example.py8.0 KB
- LICENSE.md1.0 KB
- LIMITATIONS.md2.2 KB
- README.md7.5 KB
- scorecard_report.py10.9 KB
- scorecard_track.py11.0 KB
- scorecard.py17.9 KB
- SKILL.md8.7 KB
Overview
This skill provides a configurable output-quality evaluation framework for AI agents. It lets you define measurable quality dimensions, run pattern-based automated checks or manual rubrics, and track quality trends over time. Everything runs locally with no external API calls and no LLM-as-judge.
How this skill works
You define dimensions, rubrics, weights, and pass/fail thresholds in a configuration file. The engine runs automated pattern checks (format compliance, filler words, required sections, style consistency, length) or guides a human through manual scoring, and can blend both. Results are aggregated per your chosen method and appended to a local history for trend analysis, comparisons, and report generation.
When to use it
- Validate whether prompt or config changes improved agent outputs
- Automate regression checks after adding tools or code changes
- Compare output quality across models or agent versions
- Establish team-wide rubrics and pass/fail thresholds
- Monitor long-term output quality and detect degradation
Best practices
- Start with a small set of clear dimensions (accuracy, completeness, format) and expand as needed
- Set realistic thresholds and weights reflecting business priorities
- Use blended mode to combine fast automated checks with targeted human review
- Store history centrally and run periodic trend analyses to catch slow regressions
- Treat config files as trusted: review any external config before loading due to code execution risk
Example use cases
- Prompt engineering experiments: measure objective before/after impact
- Model comparison: run identical tasks across models to rank quality
- Agent regression testing: run automated checks in CI to catch regressions
- Operational monitoring: daily or weekly scoring to detect slow drift
- Team QA: shared rubrics for consistent manual reviews across reviewers
FAQ
No. All automated checks are pattern-based and local; there are no calls to external APIs or LLMs for scoring.
Is it safe to load a config from an untrusted source?
No. Config files are executed as Python code when loaded. Only use configs you or your team have inspected, as they can run arbitrary code on your system.