0
GitHub Stars
1
Bundled Files
2 months ago
Catalog Refreshed
4 months ago
First Indexed
Readme & install
Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.
Installation
Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.
npx veilstrat add skill duong/dotfiles --skill think- SKILL.md1.5 KB
Overview
This skill applies Reflective Thought Composition (RTC) to break down and analyze complex problems with a repeatable, structured reasoning pipeline. It guides the agent through restating the problem, generating options, critiquing assumptions, exploring alternatives, scoring choices, and delivering a clear recommendation. Use it to produce evidence-backed conclusions and transparent chains of thought.
How this skill works
The process enforces a six-step inspection for every problem: restate the prompt, ideate multiple approaches, reflect critically on weaknesses, expand orthogonally to find overlooked angles, score and rank options, then respond with a recommended path. Depth can be adjusted with a depth flag (d=1 to d=10) to vary brevity versus thoroughness. Each step shows concise, information-dense work so reasoning is auditable and actionable.
When to use it
- Solving multi-step engineering or design problems
- Comparing trade-offs between competing technical approaches
- Planning complex projects with interdependent risks
- Preparing for high-stakes decisions that need documented reasoning
- When asked to "think deeply" or show a chain of thought
Best practices
- Always start by restating the problem in your own words to confirm scope and constraints
- Generate at least three distinct approaches during ideation to avoid tunnel vision
- Explicitly list assumptions and potential failure modes in the reflection step
- Use orthogonal expansion to surface unconventional or cross-domain options
- Apply a simple, consistent scoring rubric during evaluation so comparisons are reproducible
Example use cases
- Designing a scalable architecture and comparing cost, latency, and operational complexity
- Choosing between algorithms by weighing accuracy, runtime, and dataset constraints
- Preparing a research plan or PhD-level literature review with prioritized experiments
- Planning product roadmaps that balance customer value, engineering effort, and risk
- Diagnosing ambiguous system failures by generating and testing multiple hypotheses
FAQ
Adjust with the depth flag: d=1 for one-line summaries, d=5 for a balanced breakdown, d=10 for detailed bullet-point analysis and evidence.
Will this expose chain-of-thought?
The skill encourages showing work for transparency and auditability. For contexts that require limited internal reasoning, use lower depth and redact sensitive internal notes.