multi-agent-thinker_skill

This skill helps you orchestrate complex reasoning tasks by coordinating specialized sub-agents to analyze, design, and critique multi-perspective solutions.
  • Python

0

GitHub Stars

1

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill codingheader/myskills --skill multi-agent-thinker

  • SKILL.md16.5 KB

Overview

This skill is the Heavy Lifting Engine for complex problem solving. It coordinates multiple lightweight agents to expand reasoning capacity, isolate context, and parallelize subtasks. The goal is reliable, scalable cognition for ambiguous, multi-step, or high-stakes requests.

How this skill works

The skill evaluates the user request for ambiguity, planning needs, multiple perspectives, or explicit cognitive-strategy triggers. When invoked, it spawns a coordinator and specialized sub-agents using one of three patterns (supervisor/orchestrator, peer-to-peer swarm, or hierarchical) and routes work with clear handoff protocols. It enforces context isolation, validation checkpoints, and consensus or debate protocols to mitigate hallucination and error propagation.

When to use it

  • Request is ambiguous or underspecified (e.g., “Design a system…”).
  • You need reasoning, architecture, or planning before coding.
  • You want multiple perspectives, critique, or debate on a decision.
  • You ask explicitly for cognitive strategies (Socratic, pre-mortem, devil’s advocate).
  • The task requires parallel analysis of independent sources or documents.

Best practices

  • Choose architecture pattern to match task: supervisor for strict control, swarm for exploration, hierarchical for layered workflows.
  • Keep sub-agent contexts minimal: pass instructions or use persistent files instead of full context dumps when possible.
  • Implement direct pass-through for final sub-agent outputs to avoid supervisor paraphrase errors.
  • Weight agent votes by confidence and expertise; use adversarial critique rounds for high-stakes conclusions.
  • Monitor behavioral triggers (stall, sycophancy, divergence) and apply circuit breakers or retries.

Example use cases

  • Designing complex software architecture with trade-off analysis across modules.
  • Running comparative research across many documents or sources in parallel.
  • Pre-mortem risk analysis for a project with adversarial critique rounds.
  • Reverse-engineering mature products to derive an inferred spec and feature set.
  • Creating multi-layered workflows for enterprise processes requiring strategic, planning, and execution coordination.

FAQ

Minimize inter-agent chatter, batch results, use instruction passing or persistent storage rather than full context replication, and prefer stronger models over simply increasing tokens.

When should I let a sub-agent reply directly to the user?

When the sub-agent’s output is a complete, format-sensitive response and supervisor synthesis would risk losing fidelity—use a forward_message mechanism to pass it unchanged.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational