codex-claude-cursor-loop_skill

This skill orchestrates a triple-AI engineering loop among Claude, Codex, and Cursor to plan, validate, implement, and refine code quality.
  • HTML

771

GitHub Stars

2

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill bear2u/my-skills --skill codex-claude-cursor-loop

  • README.md10.1 KB
  • SKILL.md8.0 KB

Overview

This skill orchestrates a triple-AI engineering loop where Claude handles planning and final architectural review, Codex validates plans and reviews code, and Cursor implements and executes changes. It enforces sequential validation, continuous feedback, and session-managed implementation to maximize code quality and reduce defects. The loop repeats until all validations pass.

How this skill works

The workflow begins with Claude producing a structured implementation plan and assumptions. Codex evaluates that plan for logic, security, edge cases, and architecture flaws; feedback triggers plan refinement if needed. Once validated, Cursor implements the plan in a tracked session; Codex then performs a code review and Claude performs a final architectural check. If issues are found, Claude produces fix plans and Cursor applies fixes in the same session, repeating reviews until approval.

When to use it

  • Building new features that require rigorous design and safety checks
  • Refactoring critical code or systems where regressions must be minimized
  • Implementing security-sensitive components (auth, crypto, data handling)
  • Onboarding multi-AI workflows where traceability and session history matter
  • Iterative development where repeated validation and fixes are expected

Best practices

  • Always validate implementation plans with Codex before starting implementation
  • Keep the same Codex and Cursor models for consistency across iterations
  • Store and reuse the Cursor session ID for all follow-up fixes to preserve context
  • Document assumptions, handoffs, and who produced each artifact at each phase
  • Never skip Codex code review or Claude's final architectural review

Example use cases

  • Design and implement a new microservice: Claude drafts the architecture, Codex validates, Cursor implements, then reviews and finalizes
  • Add security hardening: Claude outlines threat model and fixes, Codex validates edge cases, Cursor applies patches in-session
  • Large refactor: Claude breaks down steps, Codex checks for regression risks, Cursor executes changes while preserving session history
  • Rapid prototype to production: iterate plan→validate→implement cycles until performance and security checks pass

FAQ

List sessions with cursor-agent ls, choose the session ID, and reuse it with --resume for subsequent Cursor calls to retain history.

What if Codex and Claude disagree on a finding?

Capture both findings, have Claude synthesize a prioritized fix plan, then send fixes to Cursor and re-run Codex review; maintain the same Codex model for consistency.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational