- Home
- Skills
- Arjenschwarz
- Agentic Coding
- Explain Like
explain-like_skill
- Python
16
GitHub Stars
1
Bundled Files
2 months ago
Catalog Refreshed
4 months ago
First Indexed
Readme & install
Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.
Installation
Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.
npx veilstrat add skill arjenschwarz/agentic-coding --skill explain-like- SKILL.md4.2 KB
Overview
This skill explains code changes or design documents at three progressive expertise levels: beginner, intermediate, and expert. It helps reviewers and authors quickly grasp what changed, why it matters, and where gaps or risks live. Use it to validate PRs, branches, or design drafts and to create clear, multi-audience documentation.
How this skill works
When invoked, the skill gathers the subject: diffs and commits for a branch/PR or the specified design file. It then produces three structured explanations that follow the same template (What/Why/Key concepts for beginner; Changes/Implementation/Trade-offs for intermediate; Deep dive/Architecture/Potential issues for expert). For design validation it adds a findings section listing gaps, logic issues, questions, and recommendations. Optionally it can save the output to a recommended specs path after user confirmation.
When to use it
- After finishing a feature branch or PR to summarize and validate changes
- When drafting or reviewing a design doc to surface missing assumptions
- Before code review to create a clear, audience-tailored explanation
- When onboarding teammates or creating handoff documentation
- To audit architectural implications and hidden failure modes
Best practices
- Always include the base branch or design file path so diffs are accurate
- Generate all three levels every time — beginner explanations reveal assumed knowledge
- Highlight files/components changed and key commits in the intermediate level
- List concrete gaps and recommendations during design validation
- Ask for permission before writing explanations back into the repo
Example use cases
- "Explain this PR" — produce beginner/intermediate/expert summaries and risk list for reviewers
- "Validate this design" — read a design doc, explain at three levels, and output validation findings
- "Explain like I'm a beginner" — create an accessible summary for non-engineers or new hires
- Create a specs/explanation.md for a feature after approval, with a clear record for future maintainers
- Use expert-level output to identify performance and integration concerns before deployment
FAQ
Yes — it can write to a suggested specs path but will ask for confirmation before making changes.
Does it require git and PR metadata?
For branch/PR explanations, access to the repo and git history produces the best results; design validation only needs the design file.
Will it always produce all three levels?
Yes. The workflow intentionally generates beginner, intermediate, and expert explanations on every run to expose different gaps and audiences.