titans_skill

This skill performs a three-lens code review using Epimetheus, Metis, and Prometheus to surface issues, clarity gaps, and future risks.
  • Python

0

GitHub Stars

2

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill spm1001/trousse --skill titans

  • README.md1.7 KB
  • SKILL.md7.8 KB

Overview

This skill runs a three-lens code review using parallel subagents: Epimetheus (hindsight), Metis (craft), and Prometheus (foresight). Triggered by /titans, /review, or phrases like "review this code", it inspects scoped work after substantial changes and produces a synthesized action-oriented summary. Use it as the final quality gate before /close.

How this skill works

You scope the review (files, directories, or session changes) and dispatch three parallel reviewers using deep reasoning models. Each reviewer returns structured findings (findings, assumptions, could-not-assess, questions). The skill synthesizes overlaps, conflicts, and a prioritized critical path into a single actionable report.

When to use it

  • After completing substantial work, before calling /close
  • As the final quality gate prior to shipping a feature or release
  • Periodic hygiene to uncover hidden debt or rot
  • When you need multiple perspectives (bugs, craft, and future fit)
  • When the change is long-lived or consumed by other systems

Best practices

  • Scope narrowly and explicitly — avoid sending the entire repo accidentally
  • Provide context (CLAUDE.md, README, intended consumers) to reduce 'could not assess' gaps
  • Run only for substantial, long-lived changes — skip tiny fixes or throwaway prototypes
  • Dispatch all three reviewers in parallel and always synthesize their outputs
  • If a reviewer fails, rerun with tighter scope and note the missing lens in the synthesis

Example use cases

  • Final review of a completed feature branch before merging
  • Evaluate a refactor for regressions, clarity, and future extensibility
  • Assess documentation, architecture notes, or process changes using the same three-lens pattern
  • Periodic audit of a subsystem to find hidden fragility and roadmap gaps
  • Pre-release checklist to surface critical fixes and unresolved questions

FAQ

Epimetheus finds bugs, debt, and fragility; Metis evaluates clarity, idiom, and fit-for-purpose; Prometheus checks vision, extensibility, and future knowledge capture.

What if a reviewer times out or errors?

Proceed with available reviews, note the missing lens in the synthesis, and consider re-running the failed reviewer with a tighter scope.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational