10
GitHub Stars
1
Bundled Files
2 months ago
Catalog Refreshed
4 months ago
First Indexed
Readme & install
Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.
Installation
Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.
npx veilstrat add skill rhuss/cc-slidev --skill slide-quality- SKILL.md15.0 KB
Overview
This skill evaluates presentation slides against a research-backed 12-point checklist to produce an evidence-based quality score and prioritized fixes. It is designed for technical presenters who want clear, accessible, and audience-friendly slides for conferences or team briefings. Use it to get concrete, actionable recommendations that follow cognitive-load and accessibility guidance.
How this skill works
Load the canonical presentation guidelines before analysis to ensure checks align with the evidence-based criteria. The skill inspects one slide at a time for the 12 criteria (one idea, meaningful title, element count, word count, visuals, font sizes, contrast, colorblind safety, standalone comprehension, phrase style, white space, and explainability). It returns a numeric score, a per-criterion pass/fail list, identified critical violations, and prioritized, concrete recommendations including quick-win edits.
When to use it
- When asking to analyze slide quality, review slide, or check slide design
- Before a conference talk or technical demo to ensure accessibility and clarity
- When preparing slides for asynchronous sharing or publication
- To validate slides against cognitive-load and WCAG-informed guardrails
- When you need prioritized, research-based fixes rather than generic feedback
Best practices
- Ensure each slide communicates exactly one central idea and a title that asserts the takeaway
- Limit simultaneous elements to six or fewer and keep body text under 50 words
- Include at least one supporting visual and use phrase-style bullets (3–6 words)
- Maintain accessible font sizes (body ≥18pt, heading ≥24pt), contrast ≥4.5:1, and colorblind-safe encodings
- Use white space generously (≥10% margins) and confirm slides are explainable in ~90 seconds
Example use cases
- Pre-conference audit to turn a draft deck into a publication-ready talk
- Quick pass to fix critical violations (one-idea, word count, element count) before rehearsal
- Accessibility review to verify font sizes, contrast, and colorblind-safe encodings
- Converting dense technical slides into a sequence of focused, explainable slides
- Validating titles so the slide sequence tells a clear story for distracted viewers
FAQ
Load the authoritative presentation guidelines first so the checks and thresholds match the evidence-based criteria.
What happens if a slide is a code-heavy or reference slide?
Code and reference slides are allowed exceptions; the skill flags them and applies adjusted checks (e.g., relaxed word limits for short code blocks or marking reference slides as exempt).
How is the quality score interpreted?
Score is 0–12: 12 = publication-ready; 10–11 = good; 8–9 = acceptable; 6–7 = poor; <6 = critical redesign needed.