multi-source-investigation_skill

This skill helps you verify complex claims across diverse sources by triangulating evidence and auditing credibility for each fact.
  • HTML

25

GitHub Stars

1

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill poemswe/co-researcher --skill multi-source-investigation

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB

Overview

This skill performs rigorous, multi-source investigations to verify complex claims and reconcile conflicting information. It applies academic-grade triangulation, credibility auditing, and traceability to produce a concise, evidence-weighted verdict and an audit trail. The output is a structured Investigation Report suitable for fact-checking, briefing, or escalation.

How this skill works

The skill decomposes a central claim into testable sub-claims, runs broad reconnaissance across news, academic, official, and social sources, then executes targeted verification searches for each sub-claim. It audits each source for reliability and bias, cross-references at least three independent sources when possible, and compiles a Verification Matrix, a Source Credibility Audit, and a final conclusion with confidence levels. Final deliverables include URLs or citations and checkpoint questions to guide follow-up.

When to use it

  • Fact-checking high-impact or disputed public claims
  • Investigating contradictory reports or data discrepancies
  • Preparing briefings that require source-level traceability
  • Assessing credibility of newly published studies or viral posts
  • Prioritizing follow-up research on unfolding stories

Best practices

  • Break the topic into clear, testable sub-claims before searching
  • Always seek at least three independent corroborating sources for key facts
  • Document URLs, publication dates, and funding or affiliation notes for every major source
  • Flag and explain discrepancies rather than forcing a single narrative
  • Assign confidence levels tied to source types (peer-reviewed, official data, reputable media, anecdotal)

Example use cases

  • Verify a viral statistic circulating on social media by tracing to original data and peer-reviewed literature
  • Compare competing official statements across agencies and identify factual divergences
  • Audit a study for methodological red flags and locate independent replications or critiques
  • Assemble an evidence-weighted briefing on a developing geopolitical event for decision-makers

FAQ

Aim for at least three independent sources for critical claims; fewer may be acceptable for minor facts if they come from highly reliable primary sources.

Can the skill assess social media posts?

Yes. Social posts are used for leads and context but are audited for provenance and corroborated with authoritative sources before being treated as evidence.

Will you provide raw source links and citations?

Yes. Every verified fact includes digital footprints (URLs, citations) and notes on source reliability and bias.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational