narrative-conductor_skill

This skill defines and validates a complete 7-act narrative arc for NEW TEMPS X, ensuring coherence and adherence to the show's structure.
  • Python

2

GitHub Stars

1

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill nmarchand73/new_tempsx --skill narrative-conductor

  • SKILL.md13.2 KB

Overview

This skill defines and enforces the seven-act narrative architecture used for NEW TEMPS X episodes. It helps creators design a full episode arc or validate individual acts against strict structural, tonal, and thematic rules. Use it to ensure alternation of narrators, absence of sensationalism, and preservation of the Temps X documentary spirit.

How this skill works

The skill can generate a complete episode outline: title, a 2–3 paragraph narrative arc, and a single theme for each of the seven acts. It also validates proposed acts or full episodes against explicit criteria: structural role, narrator alternation, factual tone, and narrative resonance. Validation responses are returned in a concise JSON format with clear issues and actionable suggestions when rejection is necessary.

When to use it

  • You need a complete 7-act episode arc that fits NEW TEMPS X format.
  • You must validate one act or a full episode for structural and tonal compliance.
  • You need to convert a scenario or research into a Temps X–style narrative trajectory.
  • You want to audit content for sensationalism, Wikipedia-style summary, or broken narrator alternation.

Best practices

  • Start by identifying the core question or philosophical hinge of the scenario.
  • Respect the fixed order of the seven acts and alternate narrators (odd = Narrator 1, even = Narrator 2).
  • Keep the Decryptage (Act II) factual and calm—no hype or marketing language.
  • Use Act IV as a short immersive fiction piece without exposition; rely on prior acts for context.
  • When rejecting, provide specific, actionable improvements and preserve strengths to guide revision.

Example use cases

  • Create an episode arc about brain–computer interfaces, mapping scientific explanation to ethical tension and a short fictional scene.
  • Validate Act III submitted by a writer to ensure it raises open questions rather than listing promises.
  • Audit a complete draft episode for narrator alternation, act length balance, and avoidance of sensational claims.
  • Transform research notes into a Temps X–compliant outline with themes per act and clear act connections.

FAQ

Mixing roles is a grounds for rejection. Recommend splitting content so each act fulfills its single prescribed function and preserving narrator alternation.

How strict is language about sensationalism?

Very strict: avoid hype, sweeping claims, and list-style promises. The tone must be documentary, nuanced, and interrogative where appropriate.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational