case-justification_skill

This skill helps you draft precise case justification sections for interview-based sociology articles by aligning context with theory and cluster benchmarks.

14

GitHub Stars

1

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill nealcaren/social-data-analysis --skill case-justification

  • SKILL.md11.7 KB

Overview

This skill drafts case justification sections for interview-based sociology articles, grounded in analysis of 32 Social Problems/Social Forces pieces. It guides cluster selection (Minimal, Standard, Deep Historical, Comparative, Policy-Driven), component coverage, positioning relative to theory, and target word counts.

How this skill works

I assess your study details to pick the appropriate cluster using a decision tree (policy-first? multi-site? historical focus?). Then I draft a full case justification that follows cluster-specific templates: opening move, required contextual components, and the recommended ending/transition. Finally I help calibrate length, components, and transitions to match genre benchmarks.

When to use it

  • Draft a new case justification for an interview-based article
  • Restructure an existing case section that is too long, too brief, or mismatched to study type
  • Decide whether to place the case section before or after the theory section
  • Ensure the section follows journal conventions and target word counts
  • Prepare a comparative or historical case treatment with appropriate tables or chronology

Best practices

  • Default to the Standard cluster for typical single-site interview studies unless clear triggers indicate otherwise
  • Open with a Phenomenon–Site link when possible to connect theory and context quickly
  • Match your word count to cluster benchmarks (e.g., Standard 700–1,000; Comparative 1,000–1,500)
  • Use a single subsection heading for most sections; reserve multiple subsections for comparative or deep historical treatments
  • Avoid metadiscourse (e.g., “In this section I will…”) and over-signposting

Example use cases

  • Single-site ethnographic interviews on organizational behavior — use Standard Context and emphasize institutional description and sampling rationale
  • Two-city comparative interviews on housing policy — use Comparative cluster, parallel site descriptions, and a table to show variation
  • Oral-history interviews tracing a social movement — use Deep Historical cluster and a chronological narrative
  • Study of a new law where the policy itself is the phenomenon — use Policy-Driven cluster and position the case before theory

FAQ

If your site is widely known or your paper emphasizes methods/findings over context, pick Minimal (300–500 words). Otherwise use Standard (700–1,000 words).

Should I include tables in the case section?

Only include tables for Comparative treatments; tables signal parallel site comparison and are rare elsewhere.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational