- Home
- Skills
- Nealcaren
- Social Data Analysis
- Case Justification
case-justification_skill
14
GitHub Stars
1
Bundled Files
2 months ago
Catalog Refreshed
4 months ago
First Indexed
Readme & install
Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.
Installation
Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.
npx veilstrat add skill nealcaren/social-data-analysis --skill case-justification- SKILL.md11.7 KB
Overview
This skill drafts case justification sections for interview-based sociology articles, grounded in analysis of 32 Social Problems/Social Forces pieces. It guides cluster selection (Minimal, Standard, Deep Historical, Comparative, Policy-Driven), component coverage, positioning relative to theory, and target word counts.
How this skill works
I assess your study details to pick the appropriate cluster using a decision tree (policy-first? multi-site? historical focus?). Then I draft a full case justification that follows cluster-specific templates: opening move, required contextual components, and the recommended ending/transition. Finally I help calibrate length, components, and transitions to match genre benchmarks.
When to use it
- Draft a new case justification for an interview-based article
- Restructure an existing case section that is too long, too brief, or mismatched to study type
- Decide whether to place the case section before or after the theory section
- Ensure the section follows journal conventions and target word counts
- Prepare a comparative or historical case treatment with appropriate tables or chronology
Best practices
- Default to the Standard cluster for typical single-site interview studies unless clear triggers indicate otherwise
- Open with a Phenomenon–Site link when possible to connect theory and context quickly
- Match your word count to cluster benchmarks (e.g., Standard 700–1,000; Comparative 1,000–1,500)
- Use a single subsection heading for most sections; reserve multiple subsections for comparative or deep historical treatments
- Avoid metadiscourse (e.g., “In this section I will…”) and over-signposting
Example use cases
- Single-site ethnographic interviews on organizational behavior — use Standard Context and emphasize institutional description and sampling rationale
- Two-city comparative interviews on housing policy — use Comparative cluster, parallel site descriptions, and a table to show variation
- Oral-history interviews tracing a social movement — use Deep Historical cluster and a chronological narrative
- Study of a new law where the policy itself is the phenomenon — use Policy-Driven cluster and position the case before theory
FAQ
If your site is widely known or your paper emphasizes methods/findings over context, pick Minimal (300–500 words). Otherwise use Standard (700–1,000 words).
Should I include tables in the case section?
Only include tables for Comparative treatments; tables signal parallel site comparison and are rare elsewhere.