academic-research_skill

This skill conducts deep academic research across philosophy, neuroscience, cognitive science, and theoretical CS, producing structured literature reviews and
  • Python

0

GitHub Stars

2

Bundled Files

2 months ago

Catalog Refreshed

4 months ago

First Indexed

Readme & install

Copy the install command, review bundled files from the catalogue, and read any extended description pulled from the listing source.

Installation

Preview and clipboard use veilstrat where the catalogue uses aiagentskills.

npx veilstrat add skill chrislemke/stoffy --skill academic-research

  • domains.md6.8 KB
  • SKILL.md4.0 KB

Overview

This skill conducts deep academic research across philosophy, neuroscience, cognitive science, and theoretical computer science. It locates, evaluates, and synthesizes scholarly literature to produce concise, citation-ready reports and reading lists. Use it to transform broad questions into targeted literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, or research gap analyses.

How this skill works

I begin by scoping the query: domain, depth (quick/standard/deep), and focus (empirical, theoretical, historical, or debate). I search in waves across focused repositories (arXiv, Semantic Scholar, PhilPapers, PubMed/NCBI) and follow citations to high-impact work. Each source is evaluated for relevance, authority, recency, and type, then triangulated to identify consensus, debates, and gaps. Output is a structured research report with summary, key findings, theoretical landscape, open questions, and recommended reading in APA-style citations.

When to use it

  • You need a literature review or annotated bibliography on a topic in the covered domains.
  • You want a list of seminal and recent papers with short annotations and direct links/DOIs.
  • You need synthesis of empirical findings or competing theoretical positions.
  • You want to map research gaps and propose next-step questions or experiments.
  • You need to verify claims with peer-reviewed sources and distinguish preprints.

Best practices

  • Specify domain and desired depth (quick/standard/deep) so results match your needs.
  • Give a clear focus (empirical findings vs. theory vs. history) to prioritize sources appropriately.
  • Ask one clarifying question if scope or terminology is ambiguous before the search.
  • Prefer primary sources; flag preprints and note peer-review status in outputs.
  • Request follow-up actions: expanded source lists, full-text retrieval, or write-ups for different audiences.

Example use cases

  • Literature review on predictive processing in cognitive neuroscience with 15–20 prioritized papers.
  • Survey of computability results related to probabilistic Turing machines and recent complexity bounds.
  • Annotated reading list for philosophy of mind covering materialism, dualism, and functionalism.
  • Synthesis of empirical evidence on neural correlates of consciousness with consensus map and open questions.
  • Rapid briefing on state of AI alignment theory with key authors, debates, and research gaps.

FAQ

Yes. Preprints (arXiv, bioRxiv) are included when relevant and explicitly flagged as non-peer-reviewed with their arXiv ID or URL.

What citation style do you use?

Default output uses APA 7th edition with DOIs as https://doi.org/...; alternative styles available on request.

Built by
VeilStrat
AI signals for GTM teams
© 2026 VeilStrat. All rights reserved.All systems operational